New Paragraph

OpEd: Is there systemic racism in policing in Canada?
June 6, 2020

No, not in my view.

However I do believe that there are racist police officers in most or all police services in this country and across North America.

 

This is not a Master’s thesis or an empirical research paper. It is simply my opinion, based on 36 years serving as an officer and leader of one of North America’s largest police services and having additionally studied police activities and the analysis and reporting surrounding same, for the 6 years since.

 

The many protests – mostly peaceful that are occurring around the world following the murder of a Minneapolis man of colour at the hands of police, are quite rightfully demonstrating against racism and against police brutality, neither of which are acceptable. Focused and respectful dialogue on these topics is a good thing in my view. Some of the resulting narrative concerns me though, as Canadian police are being accused by some of “systemic racism”. I don’t believe that broad-brush characterization is accurate or fair.

 

My understanding of "systemic racism" is that racism is entrenched in an organization’s members, policies and processes, which then results in certain racial groups being categorically treated unfairly. It would be a pervasive culture of racism.

 

Is that what we are seeing in Canadian police services?

 

Racism is not confined to white people. And similarly is not only directed towards black people. Unfortunately racism exists throughout all societies – entrenched more deeply in some than in others, but it involves people of all colours.

 

Racial profiling or what became known as “carding” in Ontario, started out decades ago as a process that was never meant to be unconstitutional, discriminatory or to offend the rights of community members whatsoever. Officially known as “street checks”, the intent was to have a process for police to record information about suspicious people in suspicious circumstances with the hope that someday that information would link with other information gathered and help solve crimes. I submitted hundreds of them as a uniformed police officer on outlaw motorcycle gang members traveling across the province; known criminals in high-crime areas and who they were associating with; and more. Traditionally that has been an expected role for police, but never designed to be a racially-based system.

 

Thankfully, “Walking while black” has never been an offence under any legislation, however the “application” of the street check system by some officers in some locations in some jurisdictions led to a disproportionate number of people of colour being checked by police. The statistics in some municipalities spoke for themselves. No police chief would knowingly accept officers arbitrarily checking non-white citizens and gathering information from them for no valid reason, but it was happening. Fragile relationships between some community members and their police services understandably grew. That well-publicized concern inevitably affected police agencies from coast to coast and substantive change resulted.

 

A number of organized crime groups are ethnically based. Outlaw bikers are mostly white. Triads are Chinese. MS-13 members are largely Hispanic. La Cosa Nostra – Italian. East European organized crime groups are just that – eastern European. That is not a damnation of any of those racial groups whatsoever, it is simply a reality.

In Toronto, the majority of street-gang members are young black males. In northern Ontario, street gangs are almost exclusively comprised of Indigenous people. If Toronto police and the OPP are doing their jobs in relation to street gangs and are aggressively targeting them through legal intelligence gathering, investigation and enforcement, then they will be dealing with young men from specific racial groups. Arrests will be made and confrontations will occur as a result. The police at times will have to use force when making such arrests and unfortunately sometimes that won’t be pretty. But why are so many black and Indigenous young men drawn to the destructive street gang lifestyle? Why are so many living in poverty or suffering through addictions? There undoubtedly is systemic racism within the socio-economic factors that lead to those realities and that is concerning.

 

Certain areas within some specific municipalities are made up of a significant majority of people of particular ethnicities. As a result, that is the segment of the population who the local police interact with as victims, witnesses, suspects and the motoring public in that area. As a young officer I worked in a region that was largely inhabited by French-Canadian people. Did I stop more French motorists than English? Did I arrest and charge more French people than English? Of course I did, but it wasn’t done with ill-will or bias. That was simply the local demographic. But was I on patrol thinking to myself “I have to arrest and charge some French-Canadian folks tonight”? Of course not.

 

But what is important in all of the above is that all Canadians – regardless of race, creed, religion, lifestyle, age, gender or colour, are being dealt with professionally; respectfully; legally; fairly; within the rights afforded all in the Canadian Charter of Rights and legislation; in an equitable way; and within the core values of their police service. If members of one group are being treated differently in any way than members of another group, then that’s discrimination by the individuals that do it and those that allow it. If the policies, practices and leadership of the police service allow or condone such inappropriate behavior or don’t effectively address it when it occurs, then the racism is systemic.

 

Most or all of Ontario police services have anti-racism policies; diversity programs; and hold public dialogues with various community groups where issues are aired, discussed and solutions developed. Police services also have targeted recruitment programs to ensure the services are comprised of uniform and civilian employees that represent the cultural and racial make-up of the community. Some of those are more successful than others, but I know they all try. They also have imbedded policies and disciplinary codes that must be adhered to. Once again, these processes aren’t foolproof or perfect by any means, but officers continue to be formally disciplined or charged through them.

 

Three of the biggest police forces in Canada are led by people of colour. None of these leaders or any of their counterparts across the land wants anything less than the best from their people and for their communities. But unfortunately bad things happen on occasion, once again because they hire “people” and provide policing services to human beings. That’s not an excuse for bad officers, bias, excessive force or inappropriate behavior, but it is the reality they face.

 

Ontario has led Canada in the independent oversight of police, regarding complaints against police and the use of force by them. These systems are not flawless and don’t always result in the outcome desired by complainants and/or the officers involved. They are managed by people and humans are not perfect. But they must continually try their best to do the right things for the right reasons and strive to be better.

 

Investigations into police use of force must focus on a number of issues: Was it justified? If not, did it occur through malice, negligence or an honest error? Were criminal or Police Act offences committed? And throughout, was it racially-based? What level of disciplinary action applies if the policies or rules weren’t followed? And lastly, is there anything to be learned from the event from training, policy and equipment perspectives? Not answering these questions and taking decisive and fitting action as appropriate, is a failure of public policing. I firmly believe that Canadian police leaders are strongly committed to that principle.

 

Public trust is a fragile commodity for police that is earned one interaction at a time. When it breaks down because of bad officers, good officers are no longer trusted either.

It is the responsibility of the police service leaders, all employees and unions to challenge the bad officers and send a clear message that members will be held accountable for their actions.

 

ALL police services can, should and must do better for ALL the people they serve. They can never rest on their laurels and accept anything less than a constant determination to do better and make progressive change where required. However that doesn’t mean that racism is pervasive through Canadian policing or that “policing is broken” in this country like some would have us think. It is unfair to the vast majority of officers to suggest otherwise.

By Chris Lewis January 14, 2026
I’ve been watching the enhanced and prominent activity of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers over the past several months with interest. Under President Donald Trump’s second Administration, as promised he has directed ICE to arrest and remove dangerous criminal illegal aliens, and specifically pointed out murderers, rapists, etc. That sensible goal has resulted in some bad people being taken off the streets as well as roundups of people that seem to be hardly dangerous criminals, albeit technically “illegal aliens.” Regardless, the issue I want to speak to is the ongoing controversy over ICE officers – some clad in civilian attire for the most part and others wearing ICE uniforms, but all covering their faces in some fashion. My comments are not “anti-ICE.” I am 100% behind law enforcement but I’m also always honest when I see what I believe is a wrong. I worked with and still maintain friendships with people that are now retired U.S. border and immigration officers. They were the best of the best and I’m sure most current officers are nothing but well intended. This is simply about my concerns around the covering of officer’s faces. I simply don’t get it. This is not Seal Team Six deploying on a dirt road to nowhere in Pakistan, to kill Osama Bin Laden. This law enforcement operating on Main Street USA, in commercial parking lots and sidewalks. These are law enforcement officers not an anti-terrorist unit. If ICE officers need to hide their faces for some legitimate operational reason like they are engaged in an undercover operation somewhere, they should stay out of the public and media spotlight. Members of the public that support the covering of ICE officer’s faces, speak of the dangerous work they do and threats of retaliation by relatives and extremists. ICE officials defend the practice and the Acting Director of ICE stated in a July 2025 CBS interview: “I’m not a proponent masks. however, if that's a tool that the men and women of ICE need to keep themselves and their family safe, then I'll allow it.” [1] If that’s his rationale, I hope they don’t tell him they need heat-seeking missiles with nuclear warheads too. Yes, their job comes with dangers and risk. They’re law enforcement officers not ice cream truck drivers. If the reason is to mask their identity from potential bad guys (which I simply don’t buy), there are also public accountability concerns, for the good guys. For example, identifying an officer that is alleged to have used excessive force, or has even been unprofessional, is important for the public from a process perspective. In terms of the whole pile of good guys ICE also ends up dealing with, I’m concerned for the safety of ICE when they run up to a vehicle, aggressively screaming commands through their facial coverings, sometimes with guns drawn. If I was a wanted criminal, I would likely know my goose was cooked and have to make a decision in terms of my response. That would be on me. But if I was a legally armed U.S. citizen who knew they had no warrants and had never so much as received a parking ticket, I might respond with some aggressive action of my own if not 100% sure that I was dealing with law enforcement and not some half uniformed/half civilian clothed maniac with a gun. That might include initiating a gunfight or at the very least stepping on the accelerator. That’s a frightening scenario for the lawful public and should be for the ICE officers. Uniformed police officers in Canada for the most part wear either name tags, their badge numbers or both on their uniforms. In Ontario, it’s the law. Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) officers wear name tags when they enforce our borders. So do many, many local and state police officers across the U.S. They also do not hide their faces except in extremely rare circumstances. Do all of these officers not make arrests of gang members; illegal aliens; drug smugglers; and dangerous criminals? Do they hide their faces and their names out of a fear of retribution? Do they testify behind a curtain and using a pseudonym during subsequent public trials? Absolutely not. The same rules apply to our police Public Order Unit (POU) officers that unfortunately have seen more violent protest operations in the past 20 years than they did in the 100 years prior. In Toronto, it has become a full-time job. In addition to a lot of good people that are just exercising their right to peaceful protest, at times POU officers deal with some very radical extremists who want to achieve absolutely nothing but cause mayhem, destroy property and if possible, fight with police. As a uniformed police officer, tactical team member and investigator – as did many colleagues, I arrested murderers, outlaw motorcycle gang members and local criminals. I interrogated murderers and rapists for hours. I testified against all these people in court. In small town Ontario, every community member knew where my family and I lived. People I had arrested (and even their parents) knocked on the door of my home to further their arguments. I curled with a local man I’d locked up a week before and against several I’d arrested or charged. I was in and out of provincial jails and federal penitentiaries on investigations and prisoner escorts. In London in the 1980s, my wife and I dined in a lovely restaurant, just two tables away from a notorious biker I’d dealt with on a raid and at biker check-points. We simply nodded at each other and ate our meals. Many of the folks I dealt with were simply not nice people. But I was doing police work! If it was all peace, love, flowers and unicorns, everyone would want to do it. Mind you through all those years, even when I had to use force to arrest some of these individuals or take them into custody at gun point, I treated them like humans. I didn’t disrespect them; didn’t use excessive force; was professional and spoke to them like they were human beings. I truly think that can make a significant difference. In fact, some very bad people I met along the way told me that it did. Some of the publicized ICE interactions with the public have been far from professional. I know their job is difficult and at times they are dealing with complete idiots, but cooler heads should most often prevail. The leaders of ICE should ensure “Professional Public Interaction” is strongly emphasized in ICE officer training and placed front and center in their rules of engagement, then ban facial coverings during public operations. Take that decision out of the hands of the frontline ICE officers that are bravely out doing their jobs. The officers will be safer and so will the law-abiding people in the community. [1] CBS News, CBS News presses ICE head on why agents can continue using masks, YouTube, July 18, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOOGyLuRkgU 
By Chris Lewis January 6, 2026
In my view, when all the decisions are made at one end of the room, it’s a failure of leadership.
By Chris Lewis October 10, 2025
Celebration held