New Paragraph

Police Group Support of Donald Trump
September 8, 2024

Cover Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images Newsweek

Just last week, the U.S. Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), the self-proclaimed “largest and oldest law enforcement labor organization in the United States”, publicly announced their support for Donald J. Trump in the 2024 election. As a retired law enforcement officer, this sickens me.


The FOP is not a bargaining group but is a voice for police officers and given that they represent police – with over 370,000 members, the FOP is very politically influential. The general public doesn’t necessarily understand their “fraternal” role. They just see them more broadly as being “police”. Their influence should be about ensuring police agencies are well funded, sustained and that legislation supports their efforts to protect U.S. citizens.


In part, the FOP Mission Statement says: “to promote and foster the enforcement of law and order”. Is that what Donald Trump is about in any way shape or form? In my opinion, he only supports police for political capital purposes and only when they aren’t searching his home for the national security documents he denied having, or his bank accounts when investigating him for fraud. He constantly criticizes the FBI (coincidentally also a law enforcement agency), who are under the leadership of the current Director (Wray) that he appointed.


During the infamous January 6th attack on the U.S. Capital buildings which at most Trump incited and at least sat and watched on television, 140 officers were assaulted, some very seriously. Four officers who fought against the attackers have since taken their own lives. Trump has called the attackers “patriots”, said “We love you” to them and vowed to pardon those since convicted if he becomes the 47th President of the United States. This is not a man who supports police, despite scads of photographs of him smiling with his thumb up, surrounded by them in numerous photo-ops. Many of those photos nauseate me as well. They are all staged for political purposes.


In Canada, provincial legislation prevents police officers from publicly endorsing or opposing candidates in an election. Thank God. Disciplinary action would result against officers who stand up at a microphone and publicly announce their support criticism of a candidate from any party. But not in the U.S. apparently. Some Sheriffs and Police Chiefs have openly supported or vowed not to endorse various political candidates, at media events or party conventions. And in the case of the FOP, they have publicly endorsed a candidate who has already been convicted of multiple crimes; is currently charged and awaiting trial for a litany of criminal offences in several jurisdictions; was found civilly responsible for rape; has made bizarre and demeaning public statements about women; and had a close friendship with deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Think about that!


I cannot imagine what impact the FOP statement has had on the perception of Kamala Harris supporters in terms of the ability of FOP members to provide policing services and enforce the law “without fear or favour”. It’s bad enough that having a bumper sticker or front lawn sign that indicates a voter’s support of an opposing candidate may result in damage to property or physical assault from cult-like supporters in the U.S., but do those that support Harris now have to fear the police too?


I know that may be a far-fetched assertion, and I know that the vast majority of FOP members are just honest cops that would always do their jobs in a fair and unbiased manner, but public trust in law enforcement is key, and this FOP announcement may well hurt trust in policing among half or more of the U.S. population. It is also important to note that although the FOP President speaks for the entire membership, I don’t believe for a second that all 370,000 of the members agree. The majority may not, but only a few have spoken up in disagreement.


Adolf Hitler liked to see police in photo-ops as well. Pictures of German civilian police officers patrolling the streets shoulder-to-shoulder with SS soldiers in WWII did nothing to enhance the trust of the fearful public that they had anywhere to turn for protection from the initial violations of civil and human rights and on to the horrific atrocities perpetrated. He also placed the civilian police agencies under the command of the same General that the SS soldiers reported to. Mind-boggling for sure, but that’s what dictators do. They also try to convince the public that any news organizations that criticize them are “fake media”, and those that laud them are to be trusted and believed. I’m glad Trump doesn’t do that. Oh wait…

By Chris Lewis September 16, 2025
We need leadership to bring us together 
By Chris Lewis September 8, 2025
There are always many rapidly changing dynamics
By Chris Lewis June 21, 2025
Image: new-manager-training.com Imagine this scenario if you will, getting the worst boss on earth – a person who is the total antithesis of leadership. Your new “Boss” replaces a leader that wasn’t always right and was getting too old to meet the mental and physical demands of the job, but at the same time treated all those around him with respect. He tried to select people for key positions based on their experience base and his confidence that they may not always agree but the individuals picked would be honest with him, other employees and the client base. He undoubtedly made mistakes here and there and did have some flaws but would readily admit to most of them. This boss comes back to the organization having committed a list of publicly confirmed misdeeds and illegal acts – many of which would have singularly been a good reason to not hire even the lowest level of employee, and justification for imprisonment for others. However, he was chosen for the top job despite all that baggage. Conversely, he brings not one redeeming quality to the top position. From day one, it’s obvious that the new Boss is truly a “boss” and not a “leader.” He has old personal scores to settle and wreaks revenge on many employees that he doesn’t like. Not because they were dishonest, incapable or lazy, but because he perceives that they didn’t want him to return or didn’t always agree with his philosophies and rash actions during past affiliations. This activity causes panic among all employees who know they have no choice but to get aboard his out-of-control train or perish beneath it. Then – without any deep evaluation or thought, he makes tremendous cuts to many organizational programs – leaving thousands without work and lacking any strategy to provide much needed services to a vast array of client groups. He viciously cuts through the organization like a chainsaw through softwood. Why? Because he can. Some of these decisions may have had some degree of validity following a proper assessment, while others not, but that analysis never occurred. Most previous positive relationships with partner agencies and the majority of client groups are immediately scuttled by the new boss. He publicly demeans and taunts longtime allies with irrational statements and outright falsehoods. Never in the many decades of history of the organization has such broad-ranging international indignation been felt, largely as a result of his childish behavior. Very few productive relationships remain and although some new ones are developed, they are only with organizations that are poorly considered by clients and upstanding industry players. His decisions continually fly in the face of the needs of the immense client group but more align with the personal business interests of only the Boss and his business associates – some of whom are either known despots or of questionable character. Company stocks continue to plummet as a result of his silliness. That also has a significant negative impact on the fiscal picture of partner organizations around the world. Anyone that respectfully expresses disagreement or suggests alternative decisions to the Boss, are sidelined or fired, then are ridiculed and until they become unemployable. Gas-lighting, exaggerations, denials, the passing of blame and blatant lies are his norm. He seldom speaks the truth about anyone or any situation. The sycophants he has positioned to assist in his destruction of the organization, publicly praise him for his leadership and courageous decision-making, when the majority of employees and clients know it is just flagrant butt-kissing on their part. He constantly seeks and demands praise, even for things he didn’t do, then sulks and whines when he doesn’t receive it. He falsely takes credit for the few good things that do happen but quickly passes blame when things that have his fingerprints all over them, go horribly wrong. His God-complex is resounding and worsens with each passing day. His public claims of success – before and since becoming the Boss, and assertions of being the “Greatest Boss in history”, fall flat with anyone that truly knows him. He aggressively takes advantage of anyone he can but then turns on them at the flip of a switch. No one is beyond being found at the pointy end of his meanness stick. When caught making an error, he’ll blame everyone on his “team” before accepting any criticism. In fact, he’d turn on his own children if he felt it would make him look brave or heroic, or if it would prevent him from public humiliation. He states his 24/7 lies over and over so often to make his base of lemming followers believe him, that he seemingly believes them to be factual himself. Even when he is confronted with witness testimony or audio/video of his brazen lies, he blames others for being out to get him. Being accountable when things go wrong and letting the light shine on others when they go well, is beyond his comprehension. (Can you spell “narcissistic”?) Although he doesn’t understand the business, he refuses to surround himself with people that do, given that he thinks he knows more than any of them and possibly more than anybody, anywhere, ever, since the dawn of time. Public statements he makes are often completely ridiculous and childish, causing all those around him to force plastic smiles, offer him undeserved praise and nod like pre-programmed bobbleheads. People and even affiliated organizations live in such fear of his thirst for retribution that they either cow-tow to his insanity or prepare for annihilation. He is an embarrassment internally and externally, on an international scale. No past executive has even been so blatantly self-centered, mean spirited and/or inept, nor have they ever had such a negative impact on the organization and its people. It may take decades to repair all the damage he has done. Thankfully, his employment contract is only for four years, so there may be some light at the end of the tunnel. Most of those within and those reliant on the organization, as well as friends, associates, allies internationally pray that this nightmare will end at that time. If it’s not too late, that is. Just a bad dream for some or a reality for millions of us?