New Paragraph

Change causes fear and fear causes stress – and we’re all feeling it
August 25, 2024

I didn’t know that I was afraid of change until someone pointed out to me that most people are. Frankly, I hadn’t really thought about it.


But over the years, on both professional and personal fronts, I began to realize that some things were just easier to leave as is. It could be as simple as a change of social plans or trying to figure out how a new microwave works; going from paper files to computer technology; or on a larger scale, moving to a new home and neighbourhood. I eventually learned that people fear change because the status quo is too easy. But changes were fairly seldom and more minor then.


We now live, work and play in a rapidly changing world. Change is coming at our lives and careers – and at our organizations, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. Sometimes those changes are but minor speed bumps on the great road of life and at other times they are seemingly monstrous cliffs that will take every ounce of will we can muster to either defeat or circumvent them.


The ongoing cycle of change is not about to go away soon. Technological advancements are coming at us at lightning speed. Many of them make our lives easier, but others create organizational challenges in terms of exorbitant financial, training and implementation hurdles. Others impact the lives of many as simply unaffordable or too difficult to manipulate for an aging population, forcing some to live outside the digital world. Cybercrimes like identity theft; internet bullying; public shaming through social media platforms; and the sexual exploitation of children, don’t only impact enforcement agencies and the judicial system, they impact us all, either directly or through the victimization of friends and family.


The ravenous twenty-four-hour news cycle of mainstream media combined with assorted social media platforms continue to transform how we receive and digest news stories. We are continually bombarded with information – much of it unconfirmed and inaccurate. Who and what do we believe? The days of standing at a grocery store checkout and reading gossip magazines to learn that a three-hundred-pound male pro wrestler gave birth to a Tasmanian Devil, have been replaced with social media bursts that we can read anytime and anywhere on our smart phones.


The COVID pandemic negatively impacted the entire world. Despite best efforts, many of us got COVID – some more than once, but the majority of the world tried to avoid it, either by isolating from friends and family and perhaps avoiding any public gatherings or settings and or by wearing masks and disinfecting our hands and more.


It was a game-changer in terms of public health – physically and mentally. It was ‘change exercise’ extraordinaire 


Other change issues through societal events and socioeconomic matters have increased levels of stress among people in communities around the world.


We’re experiencing international conflicts that are more devastating than many people of the world have seen in their lifetimes; the increasing threat of terrorism; domestic mass shootings; large, violent and protracted public protests; guns and gang violence; rising housing prices; climate change and the related public safety threats; and very divisive political turmoil – just to name a few.


From an employee perspective, volatile economic and trade markets that may significantly alter or eliminate some industries are always a concern to an employee that is hoping to see their career through to retirement.


Emerging technologies have impacted workforces significantly. Artificial Intelligence is predicted to put masses of people out of work as it matures and expands. Every change of government at the federal or state/provincial level brings political promises to “end this” or “build that”. That affects markets, different industries, jobs, farmers, etc., etc.


The stress of “how will this impact my life, career, stock portfolio, investments, interest rates and my ability to feed my family” undoubtedly takes a toll on many segments of society.


It’s easy for people to say that they will not stress over things they cannot change. I wholeheartedly agree – in theory. But actually doing it is a different story. Those fears and that stress may change how we live our lives and can also change our perception of our safety and security and that of those we love.


That’s where leadership comes in. In companies, government agencies, the media, educational institutions and at all political levels. We need leaders from top to bottom who communicate effectively and will listen to the concerns, fears and suggestions of those they lead.


We need leaders that will make well-informed decisions that are always in the best interest of those they serve and lead, regardless of self-promotion and political party goals.  


We need leaders that are honest. Leaders that will tell us the truth regardless of whether the news is good or bad. We need to know they’ll always try their best, but when they fail they’ll stand tall before us and admit failure but go on to explain how they intend to mitigate the problem.


We need leaders that will build our trust – day after day, in good times and in difficult times. Then when the nuclear dumpster-fire begins, we can all look up and confidently say, “That’s our leader. He (or she) will get us through this.”


Are we getting that kind of leadership in our daily lives? Does that describe your leaders at work? Is that what we are seeing in government agencies, large corporations and in elected officials – locally, provincially and nationally? I do not think we are, except in isolated pockets.  


Personally, I don’t believe that this politically divisive, dog eat dog world that more often than not teaches: “If you can’t beat them lie about them” and “Screw your colleague over to better your position yourself”, has developed the type of leaders we need.


We cannot negotiate the change, the challenges and the stressors of the current world without ‘leadership’ and we’re not getting it.


So how do we do it? Stay tuned.


Next article: “Leading in a Changing World”.

By Chris Lewis January 4, 2025
Police know how to conduct major investigations and find bad guys. Although several specific factors change from case to case, their general investigative playbook remains the same. Once some ungodly multi-victim attack occurs, in very simplistic terms: the scene is protected, and the health of the living victims is looked after. Forensic experts begin processing the crime scene. Witnesses are located and interviewed. Physical evidence is gathered. Area and witness video recordings are collected and analyzed. Victims are identified. An off-site reunification centre is established where there are multiple victims. Next of kin notifications begin. At any point – if a suspect or suspects become known, their background is gathered, and the hunt begins. They need to be apprehended before anyone else is hurt. Area law enforcement officers need to know suspect details ASAP. “Motive” is at top of mind as investigators are synthesizing all this information, whether the suspect is identified or not. Of course, establishing motive often leads to identifying the suspect, but at other times identifying the suspect helps fill in the blanks on motive. What was the initial basis of what became a murder? Was it a robbery? Could it have been a street fight gone bad? Was it simply a want or need to kill someone specific or maybe anyone at all? That’s for investigators to sort out. There is an onus to warn the public or at least tell them something, i.e. “ongoing threat”, “stay indoors”, or “no threat to public safety”. There are reporting protocols to follow. Senior officers need to be advised up the food chain as do their political masters, so everyone knows what is happening. None of that should detract investigators from doing what they do best – catching killers. But that’s when the ravenous “thirst for knowledge” and political grandstanding often take over and completely interfere with police work. The only knowledge the investigators are thirsty for in those early hours is evidence and then identifying, locating and capturing bad people. They do not need politics monopolizing their time or efforts. The New Years Day massacre in New Orleans was big. Fourteen innocent party goers were killed and dozens injured. The world wanted to know what happened and the community wanted to know if they were in danger. I absolutely get that. However, what sometimes comes with such tragedies is everyone wanting to know everything. We see it in most mass murder cases, but this was an exceptional example of the insanity surrounding such a high-profile incident. Whatever blanks weren’t immediately filled in by police officials and verified mainstream media reports, were filled in by social media. In such cases police totally lose control of the narrative as rumours, theories, falsities, conspiracy theories and “hey look at me” games take over. The political party and individual positioning in this case was nauseating. In any multi-agency response, having the leaders of those agencies at press conferences in a united front makes sense. The public needs to have confidence that the situation is in the best of hands. But where did these massive press conferences where police officials are flanked by numerous politicians come from? I can see some elected leaders being present when a new program is launched or government funding is being announced, but it should never be in the early hours of a mass murder. Having a bunch of partisan wonks peacocking on stage and in follow-up interviews, helps no one at the operational level. As some of them were speaking, I was responding to their dumb questions in my mind: Was it a terror attack? Maybe, but let the experts figure that out. In the meantime, it’s a mass murder. Was the killer an illegal immigrant? Let’s worry about that when the dust settles. What political party is to blame for allowing him into the country? We don’t care. Maybe he was born here. Let’s sort that out if he turns out to be an illegal immigrant. Why wasn’t the area more secure? Good question for a future debrief. We need to get the FBI and HSI leaders before a government committee right away so we can find out who failed! Shut up. We have police work to do. There are always enough social media theories, private citizens’ investigations into suspects, outright lies and misinformation being spread to the public, without silly partisan games sidetracking investigators who are fighting to stay ahead of legitimate theories and tips. In the early hours of a mass murder case investigators are probably the busiest they have ever been, and don’t need any of this interference. Controlling the social media fever is next to impossible. It would take a sudden level of maturity across the populace that may be unattainable. But politicians at all levels need to get the message that they are not welcome on stage at operational press conferences and their comments to the media – if asked for them – aside from expressing sadness, thoughts, prayers and confidence in the police, should be “Our law enforcement agencies are investigating, and we need to let them do what they do.” Adding any theories, raising questions or passing blame is totally wrong. If elected officials truly care about their electorate and feel the need to say more, they should have some prior dialogue with the police leaders or their Public Information Officers to ensure that what they say is helpful as opposed to harmful. Otherwise, be quiet.
By Chris Lewis December 28, 2024
Violent Crime Remains High
By Chris Lewis December 20, 2024
$1.3 billion is a lot of money, but it’s nothing more than a good start.
Share by: